If You Are Trying To Contend In Commerce, You Need Desktop Management

The reason for business is to make money, and once engaged in the process, the usual trajectory for successful companies is expansion and growth. Today, it is hard to imagine being able to function in the market place without the use of information technology. For any company that is using computers, the need for desktop management is absolute.

The first and probably most used interconnecting use is the ubiquitous office electronic mail system. As soon as it is set up, it becomes extremely popular, and for good reason, it offers the fastest and surest communication method. And the fact that it can also eliminate a few meetings probably helps explain the popularity. The advent of an internal electronic mail system alone can increase productivity dramatically, allowing employees to contact one another regardless of the time of day or geographic separation. A single mass email has the greatest probability of getting to a group of employees in the fastest possible way than any other. Once transmitted, each employee has the exact same information waiting to be retrieved at their convenience. Once initiated, email usually becomes almost a habit, with employees checking for information on a very regular basis. One of the drawbacks to the new dependence on information technology is the cost of software and the licenses for multiple computer use. There is little a company can do as the programs need regular updating in order to stay current and to avoid security problems. The least expensive way to run a network is to have a central hub from which all the computers can be remotely cared for. The business and employees benefit from the ability to stay in touch with and service clients and accounts from anywhere without traveling, and when they do have to travel, they remain in contact with the home office for support and direction. The gain from the technology, however, can be lost without qualified personnel dedicated to keeping it running smoothly. Software is not always as easily installed as we would like, even those which tout a plug and play platform. Inevitably there are some machines display complications with compatibility with the configuration in place, almost the way some people present with allergic reactions to medicines most tolerate well. Dealing with these complications can cost many man hours when preformed by the average worker who maybe skilled with using the computer, but not necessarily with servicing it.

This method of maintaining the information system also helps preserve the integrity of this process, which is often sabotaged by well meaning and hard working employees who mean well. Invariably employees have experimented with a wide variety of programs on their home systems, and often grow quite fond of specific capabilities. In the attempt to either use the same productivity in the office or the desire to share their favorite program, they introduce these favorite programs to the work system.

When employees introduce software from home, they risk circumventing preventive efforts by the desktop management team to keep malware out of the system. It is complicated enough to fight the constant attacks from the external world of the internet. Protecting from intrusions within the firewalls and other protective measures is difficult, costly and inefficient and a bane to the technicians working hard to keep the system running.

There is an ironic truth in the management complaint that computers have made the business so complex that if the power goes off or the information technology freezes up, everybody may as well go home. It has come to pass that we are so deeply invested in computers to operate on a daily business that we can not continue to operate without them. While this is literally true in many manufacturing and financial sectors, it is also beginning to be the state of affairs for nearly every company, and highlights the need for systems management software.

 

Business has long had a need for more information. Management has always sought the answer to such questions as what will sell, when it should be sold, how can we get the product to the consumer quicker, and what inefficiencies are we experiencing. With the advent of the microprocessor, the old adage of be careful what you wish for may be an important consideration. We can now measure so many things and compile so much data that the manufacturing process becomes hard to recognize.

 

The manager is now faced with so much information about every topic that discerning the valuable information from background noise data is seriously problematic. Hiring decisions used to be made following an interview, with questions and answers and the unquantifiable interpersonal ques an interview provides. Today a successful candidate of yore may be electronically eliminated by an insignificant criterion before an interview is even conducted.

 

There is no question that the greater the quantity of valuable accurate data a business has to feed into the decision making process, the more likely a correct decision will be arrived at to the benefit of the company. The problem is knowing how much data is enough, and which data is useful. A manager needs to know what data was collected and under what conditions to understand the information from it. Trying to keep track of all the individual input through his area of operational control necessarily requires precious time sacrificed from running the business.

 

Like all tools, the computer has the potential for enhancing decisions with data that engenders confidence and produces results. It becomes problematic when the tool becomes the driving force in the business. If management is spending more time using the tool than created and delivering the goods and services at the heart of the company, there is a problem. While the information and uses for it grow exponentially, management possesses an ability to use it which remains fairly stagnant, which means there is inefficiency in the process as a whole.

 

It is the essence of management to see the bigger picture, to make the decisions that will not only allow for the day to day business to get done, but to have a solid feel for what needs to be done to stay in business tomorrow. These two aspects of leadership conflict with a critical element of the reality of management, balancing time requirements. To that end, information systems were initiated to allow the manager greater access to information more quickly. While this has been a success, the data has become increasingly complex, and more and more time is eaten up processing it.

 

Everyone who has been in business knows that it is unnecessary and counterproductive for the CEO of a major company to have to deal with every detail of daily operations. Likewise, managers need to be able to ask operational information of their management system and get the answers they need without having to personally collate the individual pieces of information necessary for their development. This is why it is essential the information be loaded into the system by all employees in a coordinated master software plan.

 

So while it is important that someone is aware of the collection and interpretation of all the detailed information a company has, there has to be a way to develop that raw data into useful knowledge for each level of management. This is the crux of systems management software, manipulating data collected by software systems to develop actionable information for leadership to run the business efficiently and profitably.